BY DR. KENNY CAMACHO / SERMON DELIVERED 19 FEBRUARY 2022 FOR REVOLUTION CHURCH
Good evening, everybody. It’s good to be with you again. Tonight, we are continuing our investigation into how uncertainty can actually strengthen our faith by starting a new series exploring the first half of the Gospel of Mark. We’ve chosen this particular book for a reason, and we’ve chosen these particular chapters from it for a reason, too. So, before we dive in, I want to set the stage as best I can for what the Preaching Team and I are hoping for in this series. That means tonight’s teaching time is going to be divided into two sections, each hopefully about ten minutes long: first, I want to introduce Mark’s gospel in its context, because I think this will help us see how reading through the gospel ourselves can help us grow in our own confidence in who Jesus is. And then, I want to look at the first chapter as a kind of microcosm of this question: what do we believe about Jesus?
So, to get started with context: Mark’s gospel is particularly interesting to us this year because Mark’s gospel, moreso than any other account of Jesus’s life, is interested in how we know whether or not Jesus is who He says He is. Whereas other accounts fixate on Jesus’s ability to fulfill Scripture (Matthew), on the impact of Jesus’s existence on early Christian theology (John), or on the importance of creating an accurate record of Jesus’s life (Luke), Mark is focused on whether or not the dual claims that Jesus is the Jewish Messiah and that Jesus is the very Son of God will deeply matter to the lives of people in the first century. The author clearly believes that Jesus was a man of wisdom, power, and purpose–but do you believe He was the Messiah? Do the people in the story? Are any of us willing to take that belief all the way to the end?
Mark is sometimes referred to as the Gospel of Trials, both because it begins with Jesus’s tribulations in the wilderness following His Baptism and because it spends more than half of its length on the last 24 before Jesus’s crucifixion. But that nickname also works in other ways, as well. The first has to do with the historical context of the gospel. The most-common view of critics and scholars is that the gospel of Mark was written in the mid-60s AD–perhaps the year 64 or 65–by a Christian scribe, possibly in Rome, and almost certainly under the tutelage of Jesus’s disciple, Peter. So, why do we believe this?
From the weeks following Jesus’s resurrection until the later years of the first century, the essential method for spreading the “Jesus story” was by way of personal testimonies with anchor-points in the lives of Jesus’s living disciples. In a time when less than 10% of the population was literate, this was a standard practice: it made more sense to communicate a story aimed at “regular people” through the words of eyewitnesses than to use a more limited and expensive medium like a letter or book. We can imagine how this feels, right? Think of the stories of important experiences in your own life, or in the history of your friend group or your family: do you generally record them? Or do you remember them by telling them, over and over again? It was a practical system…especially for folks who were anticipating Jesus’s return any minute!
However, in the mid-60s, three factors came together which changed the strategies of the leaders of the early church regarding the Jesus story. The first factor was the continued spread of the Jesus movement: what began in the relative-backwater of Judea had now spread throughout Asia and Europe, even leading to house-church communities in the capital of Rome. This meant it was no longer possible for every single messenger of the gospel to claim a direct connection to those first-hand witnesses! A written record (with a direct tie to those witnesses) would help to address this problem. The second factor was the fallout from a pivotal event in both Roman and Christian history, which was the Great Fire of Rome. In the year 64, 10 of the 14 wards of the capitol were burned nearly to the ground in a terrible accident. In the chaos that followed, the Emperor Nero desperately needed to deflect the blame that was piling up on his own doorstep, and he found scapegoats in those relatively-obscure and marginalized Christian house-churches we just talked about. So, Nero issued the first official decree calling for the persecution of Christians, up to and including feeding them to lions in the Colosseum, crucifying them along Roman roads, and even burning them alive to light the streets of the city. A written record, which could be shared with Christians in hiding, could be just what that community needed to know they weren’t alone and to help them face what was coming with courage. And the third factor was that, both because of the passage of time and the sudden onset of real persecution, it became clear that first hand witnesses to Jesus’s life weren’t going to be around forever. As these witnesses began to die and to be martyred, the need for a written record to add validity to the oral tradition became obvious.
So, due to these three factors (the spread of the movement, the trials under Nero, and the deaths of direct witnesses), church tradition holds that the task of writing a “gospel” fell to a man named John Mark, who was a former assistant to the apostle Paul and a longtime disciple of Jesus’s own disciple, Peter. Peter had lived the story, so his account was among the most trustworthy around. Furthermore, Peter and John Mark were both in or around Rome at the time, and they knew firsthand how important it was not just for the story to be told, but for it to be told in a way that offered reassurance during a time of literal trials. Whether the gospel was written by the historical John Mark or not, in their construction of the gospel, Christians under persecution found a mirror for their own story as they, too, were challenged to bear witness to Jesus’s identity…and since Jesus’s story ends with the hope of the empty tomb, there was a real hope that their own stories would end in resurrection as well.
Mark’s gospel is a “gospel of trials,” then, in that it focuses on Jesus’s legal trial and it comforts Christians facing their own accusations. But there’s one more thread to pull on before we shift gears, too: I think Mark’s gospel also gives us, as readers, a role to play in the courtroom. Specifically, the gospel puts us in the place of the jury! Mark lays out his case in the book like a prosecutor, telling us from the start that Jesus is the Messiah, that Jesus is the Son of God, and then calling witness after witness to back up his claim as he walks through the Jesus story. But in the end, the gospel does something that has always struck readers as being particularly strange: it ends with the empty tomb, and it leaves Jesus’s conviction as the Messiah, as the Son of God, up to us: do we believe He is who He says He is? Do we believe in Him? Are we really ready to?
So, that’s the context of Mark’s gospel: Jesus is on trial first before His peers, then as an encouragement to the early church, and finally before us, the readers. Now, let’s turn to the first chapter to see how all of this works.
Mark’s gospel lays out the big point, the big accusation, in its very first verses. The author writes,
[This is] the beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God, as it is written in Isaiah the prophet:
“I will send my messenger ahead of you,
who will prepare your way”—
“a voice of one calling in the wilderness,
‘Prepare the way for the Lord,
make straight paths for him.’”
And so John the Baptist appeared in the wilderness, preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. The whole Judean countryside and all the people of Jerusalem went out to him. Confessing their sins, they were baptized by him in the Jordan River […] And this was his message: “After me comes the one more powerful than I, the straps of whose sandals I am not worthy to stoop down and untie. I baptize you with water, but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit.”
At that time Jesus came from Nazareth in Galilee and was baptized by John in the Jordan. Just as Jesus was coming up out of the water, he saw heaven being torn open and the Spirit descending on him like a dove. And a voice came from heaven: “You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased.”
Mark 1:1-3
So, what do we see? Like we heard a moment ago, Mark–the prosecutor–immediately says who Jesus is: he is the Messiah and the Son of God. This means that Jesus is the one the Israelites have been waiting for, who will bring them real freedom, and that Jesus has the very authority of God Himself in all that he does. He’s the whole deal: he is the one who will make God’s Kingdom possible again here on this earth. That’s the big claim!
It’s worth pausing just to try and connect ourselves with what this means not just to Israel, but to us: even 2000 years later, I think we also know that there is something wrong with the world. We experience and see suffering; we feel and witness injustice. There is brokenness in our governments, in our jobs, in our marriages, in our lives. There’s even brokenness inside us, as we sense the kinds of people we could be but can never seem to be those people on our own. All that is to say that we all resonate with what Creation feels like it was meant for…but we see it, and we see ourselves, fall short of that purpose.
In Jewish tradition, the answer to that feeling is a Messiah, a person of God, who will fix Israel. But as we will see (and in what I think of as maybe the best news there has ever been!), Jesus’s sights are set on more than Israel: they are set on everyone and everything. Mark says right here at the start that this is what we are being invited to believe: Jesus is the real hope of the world.
So, who is his first witness? There are three, back to back to back, in these opening verses: first, he says that Isaiah, the ancient prophet, predicts it will be Jesus. He actually blurs a few quotations from the Old Testament here in order to say that Jesus’s first actions line up with the coming of the Messiah. This testimony is then linked to the second witness, who is John the Baptist. John believed that Jesus was the Messiah. He had been preaching in the wilderness to all of Judea, calling them to repent and prepare themselves for the Messiah’s arrival, and then when Jesus comes, John baptizes him, in faith, as that person. So, Isaiah anticipates Jesus, and John recognizes Jesus. Who is witness #3? It is God Himself: when Jesus is baptized, a voice is heard by all around which says, “You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased.” Taken together, we have agreement here between 3 unlikely sources: 1) the prophets of the past, 2) the prophet of the moment, and 3) the God for whom the prophets have been speaking. Not only does this combo support Jesus’s identity, it also validates the entire tradition of prophecy: God’s voice affirms that everyone is looking in the same direction.
What happens then?
After John was put in prison, Jesus went into Galilee, proclaiming the good news of God. “The time has come,” he said. “The kingdom of God has come near. Repent and believe the good news!” As Jesus walked beside the Sea of Galilee, he saw Simon and his brother Andrew casting a net into the lake, for they were fishermen. “Come, follow me,” Jesus said, “and I will send you out to fish for people.” At once they left their nets and followed him. When he had gone a little farther, he saw James son of Zebedee and his brother John in a boat, preparing their nets. Without delay he called them, and they left their father Zebedee in the boat with the hired men and followed him.
Mark 1:14-20
Here, we see Jesus’s central message, which is also the message we sense the Messiah should be preaching: the Kingdom of God has come near. The restoration of the world to what God intended for it, which the selfishness and pride of men have resisted, is at hand.
One of the things that I find deeply convincing about the Jesus story is how simple, and how deeply resonant, the equation of Jesus’s hope is. Let’s take a step back from the brokenness of all of Creation and just look at the brokenness in ourselves: where does it come from? What is the root-source of your own grief, your own hurt? Why aren’t you as kind, or as good, as you might be? My conviction is that it’s the same two answers for all of us: first, we have been wounded by the selfishness and pride of others, and second, when we are weary, we are selfish and prideful ourselves. This is the sabotage: I cease to be curious, I cease to be compassionate, I cease to be kind, and I pass the same hurt around in the world that first hurt me. And what is Jesus’s message, in a simple 13 words? “The kingdom of God has come near. Repent and believe the good news!” The God of the Universe has taken the initiative, has drawn near to me, has offered me forgiveness for my weaknesses and invited me to lay my burdens down and trust him to make all things new…and my job is to own up to my mistakes, to “repent,” and to accept His presence, to believe. That’s the whole story: we talk endlessly about it, and we wrestle with it, and that’s good! But in the end, that’s it: can we admit to our mistakes and trust? What makes this so hard?
Well, perhaps in answer to that very question, what do we see in the next verses? We see the first disciples put down what they are doing, what they know, in order to follow after him. That Jesus interrupts the disciples at work is no coincidence; it’s a metaphor. All we need to know at first is that what we are doing is not enough. Fishing for fish isn’t enough. Managing your nets isn’t enough. And even if we don’t know everything there is to know about what in the world a Messiah is, or what a Messiah does, or how to be a disciple, we can put the things we know aren’t enough down and take a few steps after him. That’s how belief starts: we’re curious enough, we are wondering enough, to trail behind Jesus for a while. In every gospel account, the disciples are mostly total goofuses! They never quite figure Jesus out. They also didn’t sign a Terms of Discipleship agreement on that lake shore or pledge a minimum companionship agreement for six months: they just put down their nets and took a few steps.
Ultimately, I think this is exactly the challenge for us from this first chapter: we have heard who Jesus is supposed to be…but we don’t have to be totally convinced by that yet! We only need to be curious enough to put what we’re doing down and take those first steps. If we don’t do that, we won’t ever be convinced because we’re not going to be there when the next things happen. And more than that, taking steps doesn’t mean you can’t go back to fishing! Do we trust who Jesus is enough to have the same open-handedness? Am I willing to take my discipleship one day at a time? What would change if I saw every day as a new chance to put down what I’m doing and follow? Would I pay closer attention? Would I live more curiously? 30 years into my life as a Christian, am I still interested in who Jesus claims to be?
Before we close, I want us to look at our final witness in this first chapter, because it may be the most interesting one of them all. After Jesus calls his disciples, he goes into a synagogue to teach. What he says amazes people, but
Just then a man in their synagogue who was possessed by an impure spirit cried out, “What do you want with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Have you come to destroy us? I know who you are—the Holy One of God!” “Be quiet!” said Jesus sternly. “Come out of him!” The impure spirit shook the man violently and came out of him with a shriek.
Mark 1:23-26
Our last witness to take the stand tonight is not a disciple but a demon: “I know who you are: the Holy One of God!” I bring this up, first, because it’s interesting, isn’t it? In the first 20 verses, Mark frames his gospel as a question about who Jesus is…but we could make the case that there really isn’t all that much uncertainty about this, is there? We’ve seen people believe it, we’ve heard God say it, and now, we hear it from the mouth of an evil spirit! It’s true that many of the people in this story are still wrestling with the “who” question, and they will continue to in the chapters ahead. But I want to suggest tonight that there’s a second question, which this demon asks, that is perhaps going to prove to be even more important. That question is, “what do you want with us?” What are you going to do here, Jesus?
As we close our time tonight, this is what I hope we carry with us: the Gospel of Mark is meant to invite Christians to keep their questions in front of them…because it will ultimately be those questions that see us through our own trials. If we think our faith is just about what we have declared we believe about Jesus–“Jesus is my Savior!”–we are still keeping ourselves at the center of things. We’re putting our hope in our own ability to be strong and unwavering. But the Christians in Rome are at this very moment learning the limits of their own strength in the pit of the Colosseum! And what they need–what we all need–is a hope that comes not from what we can do but from what Christ is still doing in us, despite our weaknesses. We have been invited to put down our nets and to follow Jesus in wonder. As we continue to study Scripture in the weeks ahead, what will we find? Who will we say he is?