BY DR. KENNY CAMACHO / SERMON DELIVERED 29 JANUARY 2022 FOR REVOLUTION CHURCH
Once upon a time, I was teaching a class of ninth graders about arguments. We were working through definitions of important terms, and we had spent an entire class period talking about the problems inherent in the concepts of “facts” and “opinions.” I’ve shared versions of that lecture many times here at Revolution, so I’m not going to retread that ground tonight, but the basic point was that the line between these two concepts is much blurrier than we might think, and when we get right down to it, there are good reasons to be deeply skeptical of the things we often feel very certain about in our lives. For the entire class period, I was also being observed by the dean of curriculum at the school. He and I had a lot of ups and downs in our relationship, and I was secretly pretty nervous about this observation, especially given the content of the class that day. In any case, after doing a lot of difficult work with the students for an hour, we reached the end of the lesson, and I closed by asking them to consider a question: “Is there any real way to know what is True?” They didn’t have to write an essay or anything–I just wanted to start our next class with that question: “Is there any real way to know what is True?” The bell rang and the students filed out. After the last ninth grader left, the dean came up to the front of the room where I was standing, and I’ll never forget what happened: he frowned a bit, looked me in the eye, and said, “a student should never leave your classroom confused.” Then he walked out.
That evaluation did not go well.
The reason I’ve never been able to let this story go is because, even after thinking on it and thinking on it, I’m still convinced that confusion, when it’s tied into a process of challenge and follow-through, is actually an incredibly important part of how we learn. It can be hard and even unsettling to face questions like the one I asked those students that day! But the consequence of not facing them–of living with shallow assumptions about what you know and why you think you know it–is brittleness in the things you believe.
I bring this up because this week, we are continuing in our series (Un)Certainty by moving from the personal ground we have covered in the first two weeks to the communal ground we want to think about before the series concludes. In Week 1, we talked about the danger of waiting on feelings of certainty in our lives, especially when it comes to taking a chance on religious faith. The point of that message was that seeking out and depending on absolute certainty before we take uncomfortable and difficult steps in our lives is really a way of stalling out our decision making, and it leads to simply continuing to place all of our trust, all of our confidence, in ourselves. I talked about my decision to quit smoking at the end of last year, and how I realized that all the time I was spending hemming and hawing about whether quitting was worth it really just amounted to more time doing what I wanted. To actually see change, I had to decide: is my confidence best placed in myself…or in someone or something else?
Then, last week, we talked about how we move forward from a decision to take our confidence out of ourselves and put it elsewhere. Looking specifically at Christian faith, we asked: how does confidence in Jesus actually grow? What we discovered was that it grows slowly and steadily as we let go of the things we depend on for control…and see how Jesus is faithful to us, step by step. When I stop looking to money as a way of controlling my life and start to follow Jesus’s example by living generously, I’m presented with all these little moments to pause and ask: is this working? Does my life feel more or less full? Do I see fruit from this? And if the answer is yes, I can move forward another step with a growing sense of confidence in where Jesus is leading me…and in Jesus as a leader in the first place.
Tonight, we’re shifting our focus to what happens when an entire community of people begin taking these small, careful, and even experimental steps along the same path: what does a church seeking confidence, a church embracing uncertainty, look like? And what might the benefit be to a larger city or a larger community if it is home to such a thing? In a nutshell, here’s what I think we’re going to find: I think a church embracing uncertainty becomes an oasis of mystery and wonder in a desert of arrogance and pride. A church community has both an opportunity and a responsibility to proclaim the existence of a God-sized God and to foster a different attitude about what it means to live well in the world. Churches can remind the world of the scale of eternity and the unfathomable gift of God’s attention and love. Churches can make a case for the necessity of justice, and they can give permission for grief and lament when justice is denied. The role of a church is important in the world, in our world…but in order to embrace that role in the ways we are meant to, we must stop pretending we’re okay, or that we have it all figured out.
In the first century, as Christian communities spread outward from Jerusalem, where Jesus was killed and then rose from the dead, to areas even beyond the traditional borders of Jerusalem in Europe and Asia, they, too, ran into the temptation to offer easy answers, to offer certainty, in place of the mysteries of God. And it fell upon the early leaders in the Church, such as the apostle Paul, to try and steer them back to a place of wonder and uncertainty. There are a lot of places in Scripture we could go to talk about this, but I want to center on one letter, from Paul, to a specific Christian outpost in Asia.
The church in Colossae, like most predominantly non-Jewish early churches, faced significant pressure to integrate their faith in Jesus as the Son of God with the conventional polytheistic religions of the day. This would mean placing Jesus within the pantheon of Roman gods as another–or even a favorite–god to worship. I recognize we don’t face exactly the same pressure in our day as Christians, but there is a kind of overlap here, as the root of this temptation was less about believing polytheism and more about categorizing and labeling the strangeness of Jesus himself: if Jesus is a god, we can take all the things we already believe about other gods and use them to make more sense of him! But in his letter to the Colossians, Paul instructs them not to do this and instead to embrace the mystery Jesus represents. If God actually is God, Paul reasons, we should know better than to try and simplify or summarize Him down. Instead, we should wonder at how an infinite God was fully present in Christ…and then wonder all the more at how Christ is present within us! Here’s how Paul puts all of this:
My goal is that [all the regional churches] may be encouraged in heart and united in love, so that they may have the full riches of complete understanding, in order that they may know the mystery of God, namely, Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge. I tell you this so that no one may deceive you by fine-sounding arguments. For though I am absent from you in body, I am present with you in spirit and delight to see how disciplined you are and how firm your faith in Christ is. So then, just as you received Christ Jesus as Lord, continue to live your lives in him, rooted and built up in him, strengthened in the faith as you were taught, and overflowing with thankfulness.
See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ. For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form, and in Christ you have been brought to fullness.
Colossians 2:2-10
There are three parts of that passage I want us to dig into. The first is in verses 2 and 3, which state that Paul’s goal is for the churches to have the “full riches of complete understanding”…which I’ll admit seems like a message that is at odds with my point! If the goal is “complete understanding,” what’s so wrong with trying to get to the bottom of who Jesus is, or even of trying to kind-of “bullet point” your faith: shouldn’t we be able to do this, if the goal is “complete understanding”? But Paul continues, saying that the actual state of completion isn’t quantitative, meaning that you have all the data, but qualitative, meaning that you are achieving the fullness of an experience. Paul says that the point of understanding is “that they may know the mystery of God, namely, Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.” I’m not going to get bogged down in the Greek here to prove the point, but I would ask that you take my word for it that the present tense in this verse is no accident: the goal is to know the present mystery of God, as it is still being revealed by a living Jesus, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge. That is to say, Jesus didn’t appear once in the past in order to spill all the beans about God. Rather, Jesus is still living, and through a relationship with him, one has direct access to the bottomless mysteries of God. The point isn’t finishing the God Encyclopedia! The point is being fully and intimately connected to God through His Son. That’s a bit abstract, so I’ll summarize our first point here: the goal of the church is to help folks plug into God. Jesus is the way this happens…and we, as a church, proclaim and demonstrate that Jesus is someone with whom you can actually have a relationship. You can talk to him; he can talk to you. You can get to know his heart, and his character. And your confidence in him can grow over time.
So, then what? Paul challenges the notion that being a Christian is something you simply sign up for! This is, in my view, the most dangerous temptation churches give into: in a desire to make becoming a Christian as easy and appealing as possible, we act as if a prayer and a dunk in the tub simply moves a person from Column A, which is for hellbound demon-lovers, to Column B, which is for heavenbound saints. “Which column do you want your name to be in?” But when we do this, we sell Jesus woefully, woefully short. His desire isn’t that we join his team…his desire is that we know him, and let him more deeply know us. Paul writes it like this:
just as you received Christ Jesus as Lord, continue to live your lives in him, rooted and built up in him, strengthened in the faith as you were taught, and overflowing with thankfulness.
Colossians 2:6-7
To “receive Christ Jesus as Lord” means exactly what it says: the first step in building a church, especially in non-Jewish cities like Colossae, is to set yourself up somewhere in the town square and proclaim that there’s a new King in charge, and you should hurry and get on board with him before he comes to check in. When folks were stirred by the apostles’ messages about what kind of King Jesus was–a King of love and mercy; a King with compassion for the poor–many people were eager to pledge their allegiance. This is what Paul means by “receiving Christ Jesus as Lord.” But if a person’s goal is just to get on Jesus’s good side, Paul says they’re missing the point: Jesus is already here, and you are invited to live in him, to be rooted and built up in him, to be strengthened in your faith and connection to the kind of life God intends for you. It’s not just about allegiance; it’s about learning to belong in God’s Kingdom. To summarize the second point, the work of the church is to foster deeper relationships between people and their King.
And then finally, Paul instructs the church about the ways the church must differ from the religious institutions which surround it. He says, “see to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ.” He is referring here to the cultural temptation to boil any religion down to its philosophical core, common in Hellenistic or Greek-influenced cultures: “don’t let other philosophers simplify Jesus for you…and don’t try to simplify Jesus for them!” This is human wisdom you’re chasing. But if God is really God, shouldn’t He eclipse what philosophers can know? You can learn about Him…but you can’t hope to contain him!
Man, as a pastor, I feel this temptation on a weekly basis! When we get to these teaching times each Saturday, I want more than anything in the world to finally summarize who Jesus is and what God is up to in the world in such a short, memorable phrase that everybody here will go “Aha! I get it! That’s Christianity!” Each week, I give myself 7 days to come up with such a miracle, and then 30 minutes to spit it out. But this verse reminds me that this is precisely not what a church should be doing! My goal isn’t to simplify, or to strip the Bible down into less. My goal is supposed to be to see the Bible as an arrow pointing to more. Paul says the only person or thing to ever summarize the fullness of God is Jesus Himself: “in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form…and in Christ you have been brought to fullness.” What if we paused on just that point? The infinite greatness of God was miraculously contained in the person of Jesus–who ate and drank, made friends and enemies, performed miracles and died, by human hands, on a cross. The wholeness of God died there. Paul says this is a “mystery,” and he’s right…but not in the “whodunnit?” sense, where the riddle gets solved in the end. Rather, Jesus is a mystery in the most grand and cosmic sense: he is a being in whom there is fundamentally more at work than we have the ability to hold…or boil down.
But we fundamentally and absolutely do not treat Jesus like this in the American church. In what I think is often a desire to “help God seem relatable,” we treat Jesus like the most simple and obvious things: he is God’s loving arms, wrapped around the world; he is the sacrificial lamb, killed on behalf of all us sinners; he is our Jiminy Cricket-type spirit-friend, here to give us little blessings and to keep us company when we’re lonely. We want so much to have the right metaphor for Jesus, and in search of it, we run away from any sense that there might be a part of Jesus we’re not capable of having. That he might actually be too much for us. We prefer a Jesus who comes into our lives to help us out of trouble.
We prefer stories where we get to stay the main character.
We don’t like to leave the classroom confused.
But mystery is part of the point. The witness of the church is the God-ness of God. That’s the third thing we see here, I think: just as Jesus is somehow home to the fullness of something impossible, the church is meant to be a home to that fullness, too. We’re not able to fully understand this. We’re not meant to know how to boil it down for easy consumption, to make it sing-able in a worship song. We’re supposed to be a testimony to the impossible, to the unimaginable. And we’re called to this because the world needs it. This whole time, the world has preferred a version of God that helps to explain us: why we’re here, who we are, what we’re meant for. But the truth is that we exist in order to testify to the nature and the mystery of Him: we feel love in a way that overwhelms us, but is just a fraction of the Love of God. We sense justice, but in a way that barely imitates the righteous character of God. We build communities and cities and nations, but in ways that are like sandcastles compared to the Kingdom of God. The point isn’t that we should feel small or pitiful or insignificant: the point is that in us, the mystery of God dwells.
So, as a church, our calling is to hold onto and embrace that mystery. To seek it out, and to live in the midst of it. When we do that, we bring a bit of its light into our world, and we have this chance, as a church, to say to the world around us, “Hey! That sense you have that there must be more–that people and jobs and governments aren’t enough, that we are just the tiniest parts of something bigger than we can see or understand–that sense is right! Come join us as we commit ourselves to that mystery! Help us see how much more deeply we can know it, if we seek it together! Help us pour out the beauty and the love of it in the world, as we experience and discover it, so that we’re all richer for it!”
Perhaps that’s too abstract, but for this one week, I don’t think we should apologize for that. This one week, I think it’s best to walk away with a question instead of an answer: “If God is here, what on Earth is going to happen?” The goal isn’t to figure out the right answer; in that sense, this isn’t “homework.” Rather, let’s just sit with it for a minute and see if we can’t begin to see a bit more than we could see when we came in this evening: if God is here, what…on Earth…is going to happen?